<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2009 Mock NFL Draft: 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.totalprosports.com/2009/01/28/2009-mock-nfl-draft-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.totalprosports.com/2009/01/28/2009-mock-nfl-draft-2/</link>
	<description>Play Like A Pro</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 00:48:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: WALT</title>
		<link>http://www.totalprosports.com/2009/01/28/2009-mock-nfl-draft-2/comment-page-2/#comment-13687</link>
		<dc:creator>WALT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalprosports.com/blog/?p=2820#comment-13687</guid>
		<description>As for the lions: 1) There will be many QB&#039;s with great potential to take in 2010, they should wait until next year 2) As for taking all OL&#039;s with 1st 3 picks - it probably won&#039;t happen but they need to beef up both lines and there will not be as many highly graded OTs coming out next year, 3) there are only 3-4 D-line &amp; LB&#039;s in the 1st rd that fit 4-3. If the lions can get them fine but they must take the best available and it could be O-linemen.  4) Detroit has plenty of room under the cap to keep all of the OL&#039;s </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As for the lions: 1) There will be many QB&#39;s with great potential to take in 2010, they should wait until next year 2) As for taking all OL&#39;s with 1st 3 picks &#8211; it probably won&#39;t happen but they need to beef up both lines and there will not be as many highly graded OTs coming out next year, 3) there are only 3-4 D-line &amp; LB&#39;s in the 1st rd that fit 4-3. If the lions can get them fine but they must take the best available and it could be O-linemen.  4) Detroit has plenty of room under the cap to keep all of the OL&#39;s</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad Ellis</title>
		<link>http://www.totalprosports.com/2009/01/28/2009-mock-nfl-draft-2/comment-page-2/#comment-12321</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad Ellis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 16:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalprosports.com/blog/?p=2820#comment-12321</guid>
		<description>florida ted...I agree with you on the Lions 100% but, as you will see in my updated mock draft (3.0), they will likely not do what I have suggested.  With a new defensive coach, I now see them focusing on defense with two of the top three.  I don&#039;t think it is the right thing to do, but I think it is the easy thing to do for them, and will draw less media and fan backlash. 
 
The truth is that Detroit needs help at every position, and no strategy should fail, assuming they choose good football players. 
 
Al Davis&#039;s speed fetish is well chronicled, but he will find speed in round two.  He won&#039;t find a franchise tackle in round two.  We&#039;ll have to see.  Thanks for your comments! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>florida ted&#8230;I agree with you on the Lions 100% but, as you will see in my updated mock draft (3.0), they will likely not do what I have suggested.  With a new defensive coach, I now see them focusing on defense with two of the top three.  I don&#39;t think it is the right thing to do, but I think it is the easy thing to do for them, and will draw less media and fan backlash.</p>
<p>The truth is that Detroit needs help at every position, and no strategy should fail, assuming they choose good football players.</p>
<p>Al Davis&#39;s speed fetish is well chronicled, but he will find speed in round two.  He won&#39;t find a franchise tackle in round two.  We&#39;ll have to see.  Thanks for your comments!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: florida ted</title>
		<link>http://www.totalprosports.com/2009/01/28/2009-mock-nfl-draft-2/comment-page-2/#comment-12316</link>
		<dc:creator>florida ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 15:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalprosports.com/blog/?p=2820#comment-12316</guid>
		<description>Over all good draft I hope that the Lions do draft for need and take 3 ol for the future..They can get d help in the later rounds no big names but an upgrade over what they have now..Next year draft d and in a couple of years a contender unless all the top draft picks refuse to play in big D ala Eli Manning the cry baby. It makes a lot of sence to concentrate on one side of the ball first..O linemen take a couple of years to gel and reach their potential so I think its a no brainer for the Lions.I also don&#039;t see raiders drafting Monroe Big Al loves his speed burners so for a curve ball Percy taken here..Does Al Davis have a thing for wide receivers running routes in shorts???Speed,Speed Speed is what makes Al Davis HOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over all good draft I hope that the Lions do draft for need and take 3 ol for the future..They can get d help in the later rounds no big names but an upgrade over what they have now..Next year draft d and in a couple of years a contender unless all the top draft picks refuse to play in big D ala Eli Manning the cry baby. It makes a lot of sence to concentrate on one side of the ball first..O linemen take a couple of years to gel and reach their potential so I think its a no brainer for the Lions.I also don&#39;t see raiders drafting Monroe Big Al loves his speed burners so for a curve ball Percy taken here..Does Al Davis have a thing for wide receivers running routes in shorts???Speed,Speed Speed is what makes Al Davis HOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brawley</title>
		<link>http://www.totalprosports.com/2009/01/28/2009-mock-nfl-draft-2/comment-page-2/#comment-12227</link>
		<dc:creator>Brawley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 17:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalprosports.com/blog/?p=2820#comment-12227</guid>
		<description>Nice to see a 2nd round added.  Good touch. 
 
If things unfold for Detroit as you believe,  I will drink a very cold Stella Artois to your good health. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice to see a 2nd round added.  Good touch.</p>
<p>If things unfold for Detroit as you believe,  I will drink a very cold Stella Artois to your good health.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.totalprosports.com/2009/01/28/2009-mock-nfl-draft-2/comment-page-2/#comment-12113</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 11:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalprosports.com/blog/?p=2820#comment-12113</guid>
		<description>As a Lions fan, I understand how over-due the improving of the O-Line is... Thus, I understand why you would put the first 3 selections as O-Line. Unfortunately I see the Lions taking Stafford (when I personally think Sanchez is better), and probably an ILB with the 1b pick. 
 
In my fantasy world, I would hope that Detroit would trade a 2nd and a 3rd round pick to New England for Matt Cassel, but unfortunately with Scott Pioli in KC I can see him moving there. 
 
Should be an interesting draft, but I&#039;m really concerned about being pro-active in the free agency this year... This could make it an easier draft to conduct. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Lions fan, I understand how over-due the improving of the O-Line is&#8230; Thus, I understand why you would put the first 3 selections as O-Line. Unfortunately I see the Lions taking Stafford (when I personally think Sanchez is better), and probably an ILB with the 1b pick.</p>
<p>In my fantasy world, I would hope that Detroit would trade a 2nd and a 3rd round pick to New England for Matt Cassel, but unfortunately with Scott Pioli in KC I can see him moving there.</p>
<p>Should be an interesting draft, but I&#39;m really concerned about being pro-active in the free agency this year&#8230; This could make it an easier draft to conduct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CDE9</title>
		<link>http://www.totalprosports.com/2009/01/28/2009-mock-nfl-draft-2/comment-page-2/#comment-12096</link>
		<dc:creator>CDE9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 03:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalprosports.com/blog/?p=2820#comment-12096</guid>
		<description>Chris...at this point, I&#039;m inclined to agree with you.  They need a legit PREMIERE left tackle, allowing Backus to move inside or to the right tackle spot.  Cherilus could stay put or move inside, depending on what happens with Backus.  Even if they are happy with their center, it is clear to me that they need a dominant and versatile interior lineman as well.  For a team that literally needs everything, the possibilities are endless, and value will play a key role as to who they select when.  The Lions are not short on drama during draft season.  We&#039;ll see what happens. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris&#8230;at this point, I&#39;m inclined to agree with you.  They need a legit PREMIERE left tackle, allowing Backus to move inside or to the right tackle spot.  Cherilus could stay put or move inside, depending on what happens with Backus.  Even if they are happy with their center, it is clear to me that they need a dominant and versatile interior lineman as well.  For a team that literally needs everything, the possibilities are endless, and value will play a key role as to who they select when.  The Lions are not short on drama during draft season.  We&#39;ll see what happens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.totalprosports.com/2009/01/28/2009-mock-nfl-draft-2/comment-page-2/#comment-12074</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 15:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalprosports.com/blog/?p=2820#comment-12074</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s no way Detroit uses their first 3 picks for the O-Line. Coach Schwartz has already expressed his feelings about being able to work with Backus and Cherilus. The defense is too much in need of so many positions that I am led to believe that they will use only one of their first 3 picks on an O-Line pick. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#39;s no way Detroit uses their first 3 picks for the O-Line. Coach Schwartz has already expressed his feelings about being able to work with Backus and Cherilus. The defense is too much in need of so many positions that I am led to believe that they will use only one of their first 3 picks on an O-Line pick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad Ellis</title>
		<link>http://www.totalprosports.com/2009/01/28/2009-mock-nfl-draft-2/comment-page-2/#comment-12012</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad Ellis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 18:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalprosports.com/blog/?p=2820#comment-12012</guid>
		<description>Matt...The great thing for you about this situation is that you can say whatever you want about your credentials, and there is absolutely no way I can prove you wrong.  I guess we&#039;ll all just have to take it at face value that you are a &quot;former scout&quot;.  As far as being a writer...hey, welcome to the club!  Going forward, I suggest that we leave our resumes out of it. 
 
I&#039;ll make a deal with you.  If I can systematically tear your argument to shreds, will you then rest this ridiculous case?  No?  I didn&#039;t think so.  I can only assume then, that no matter what I say, you will not be dissuaded, right? 
 
Well, what the heck...Let&#039;s discuss this charge that I&#039;ve not done my homework--specifically that I have the Lions taking Alex Mack.  First of all Mack is an EXTREMELY versatile interior lineman who can, AND HAS, played all three spots between the tackles.  If you had done YOUR homework, you would have to concede that versatility and/or dominance is what gets and interior lineman drafted in round one.  Mack is both!  NEXT 
 
I can&#039;t believe that I&#039;m going to have to respond to the &quot;contract extension&quot; argument that you posed, but...being a former scout, you should have the access and opportunity to ask SCORES of players what kind of security that provides.  You can start with the notable case of Shaun Alexander a couple years ago, in Seattle.  NEXT 
 
Monroe or Smith...I agree, surprisingly enough.  I have Smith ahead of Monroe, at this point, but all the information is not in.  We&#039;ll see there.  At number 20, I don&#039;t see how you could justify taking a linebacker at all.  The Lions spent a HIGH first rounder on Sims (strong side) a few years ago, and drafted Jordan Dizon last year in the second round to play the middle.  Unless you&#039;re suggesting that ANY team should spend a number one draft choice on a weak side linebacker, I think YOU should re-evaluate your reasoning.  If Maualuga were available, he would be worth taking as a substantial upgrade in the middle, allowing them to also upgrade the Will by moving Dizon over.  Unfortunately, Maualuga will not be there!  I would have had them take a defensive player at 20, if there were any VALUE corners, ends, or tackles available.  There simply is not.  Being familiar with the cap, you must understand why value is so important.  NEXT 
 
I will concede that if Detroit lands a versatile interior lineman at 20, they will most likely not select O-line again in round two.  Again, I saw value by selecting Robinson with the 33rd pick, but failed to recognize (initially) how they could move their existing guys around to upgrade at least one of the guard spots.  That was not from lack of preparation.  It was merely an oversight.  This draft took me a few hours.  An NFL GM has months to prepare.  My bad.  Chances are extremely good that Robinson won&#039;t be there anyway because he is such a talented prospect.  I agree that Kruger or Moore would be strongly considered at the top of round two, and my updated mock (after the combine) should reflect something similar. 
 
The only assumptions I make is which teams will select these players.  Every team has their own philosophy on how to draft players.  Some favor need over best player available, for example.  Some weigh value over need.  Some draft system specific guys, while others love the measurables.  I can&#039;t predict exactly how the draft will go.  No one can.  What I do have plenty of knowledge about, sir, is how to evaluate talent.  I&#039;m not going to get into my resume, but YOU are the one making assumptions about my background and experience without having any knowledge of it. 
 
Thank YOU for allowing me to retort your comments. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt&#8230;The great thing for you about this situation is that you can say whatever you want about your credentials, and there is absolutely no way I can prove you wrong.  I guess we&#39;ll all just have to take it at face value that you are a &quot;former scout&quot;.  As far as being a writer&#8230;hey, welcome to the club!  Going forward, I suggest that we leave our resumes out of it.</p>
<p>I&#39;ll make a deal with you.  If I can systematically tear your argument to shreds, will you then rest this ridiculous case?  No?  I didn&#39;t think so.  I can only assume then, that no matter what I say, you will not be dissuaded, right?</p>
<p>Well, what the heck&#8230;Let&#39;s discuss this charge that I&#39;ve not done my homework&#8211;specifically that I have the Lions taking Alex Mack.  First of all Mack is an EXTREMELY versatile interior lineman who can, AND HAS, played all three spots between the tackles.  If you had done YOUR homework, you would have to concede that versatility and/or dominance is what gets and interior lineman drafted in round one.  Mack is both!  NEXT</p>
<p>I can&#39;t believe that I&#39;m going to have to respond to the &quot;contract extension&quot; argument that you posed, but&#8230;being a former scout, you should have the access and opportunity to ask SCORES of players what kind of security that provides.  You can start with the notable case of Shaun Alexander a couple years ago, in Seattle.  NEXT</p>
<p>Monroe or Smith&#8230;I agree, surprisingly enough.  I have Smith ahead of Monroe, at this point, but all the information is not in.  We&#39;ll see there.  At number 20, I don&#39;t see how you could justify taking a linebacker at all.  The Lions spent a HIGH first rounder on Sims (strong side) a few years ago, and drafted Jordan Dizon last year in the second round to play the middle.  Unless you&#39;re suggesting that ANY team should spend a number one draft choice on a weak side linebacker, I think YOU should re-evaluate your reasoning.  If Maualuga were available, he would be worth taking as a substantial upgrade in the middle, allowing them to also upgrade the Will by moving Dizon over.  Unfortunately, Maualuga will not be there!  I would have had them take a defensive player at 20, if there were any VALUE corners, ends, or tackles available.  There simply is not.  Being familiar with the cap, you must understand why value is so important.  NEXT</p>
<p>I will concede that if Detroit lands a versatile interior lineman at 20, they will most likely not select O-line again in round two.  Again, I saw value by selecting Robinson with the 33rd pick, but failed to recognize (initially) how they could move their existing guys around to upgrade at least one of the guard spots.  That was not from lack of preparation.  It was merely an oversight.  This draft took me a few hours.  An NFL GM has months to prepare.  My bad.  Chances are extremely good that Robinson won&#39;t be there anyway because he is such a talented prospect.  I agree that Kruger or Moore would be strongly considered at the top of round two, and my updated mock (after the combine) should reflect something similar.</p>
<p>The only assumptions I make is which teams will select these players.  Every team has their own philosophy on how to draft players.  Some favor need over best player available, for example.  Some weigh value over need.  Some draft system specific guys, while others love the measurables.  I can&#39;t predict exactly how the draft will go.  No one can.  What I do have plenty of knowledge about, sir, is how to evaluate talent.  I&#39;m not going to get into my resume, but YOU are the one making assumptions about my background and experience without having any knowledge of it.</p>
<p>Thank YOU for allowing me to retort your comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.totalprosports.com/2009/01/28/2009-mock-nfl-draft-2/comment-page-2/#comment-12009</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 17:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalprosports.com/blog/?p=2820#comment-12009</guid>
		<description>Let me have my retort to your are all Lions fans the same.  First of all I am not a LIons fan I am a former scout who is now a writer.  I look at a lot of mock draft sites so I can come up with ideas for articles pertaining to the draft.  Now the fact that in a salary cap league you have the Lions drafting a center, who I agree is very talented, who has a center they just signed to a large contract extension a year ago shows you have not done your homework.  So, instead of sarcasm lets take a look at possible picks.  Monroe or Smith for the first pick.  Laurentis, Malaluga, Cushing.   for there second pick in the first round.  All fill pressing needs and not salary cap complications.  Or do you think that Paris Lenon is a legit starter in the NFL.  In the second round Kruger or Moore will fit the bill.   They will not take a guard all thou they need one, because they have two guards under contract and if they want a guard they will look to the third round where they have two picks. 
 
Now just because you say that some is going to be a bust doesn&#039;t mean that he will.  Unless you are at the combines or view hours of film and interview people then you are making assumptions without knowledge. 
 
Thank you for allowing me to retort your comments. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me have my retort to your are all Lions fans the same.  First of all I am not a LIons fan I am a former scout who is now a writer.  I look at a lot of mock draft sites so I can come up with ideas for articles pertaining to the draft.  Now the fact that in a salary cap league you have the Lions drafting a center, who I agree is very talented, who has a center they just signed to a large contract extension a year ago shows you have not done your homework.  So, instead of sarcasm lets take a look at possible picks.  Monroe or Smith for the first pick.  Laurentis, Malaluga, Cushing.   for there second pick in the first round.  All fill pressing needs and not salary cap complications.  Or do you think that Paris Lenon is a legit starter in the NFL.  In the second round Kruger or Moore will fit the bill.   They will not take a guard all thou they need one, because they have two guards under contract and if they want a guard they will look to the third round where they have two picks.</p>
<p>Now just because you say that some is going to be a bust doesn&#39;t mean that he will.  Unless you are at the combines or view hours of film and interview people then you are making assumptions without knowledge.</p>
<p>Thank you for allowing me to retort your comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad Ellis</title>
		<link>http://www.totalprosports.com/2009/01/28/2009-mock-nfl-draft-2/comment-page-2/#comment-11969</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad Ellis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 01:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalprosports.com/blog/?p=2820#comment-11969</guid>
		<description>bryan...I feel your pain.  Unfortunately, as you will see in April, Michael Oher is sliding down draft boards, and doesn&#039;t figure to go until the teens or later.  As you know, the other three are gone by the time the Jags pick.  I would have had the Jags select either of the two Smiths or Monroe, had any of them been there at eight.  Oher is NOT WORTH A #8 OVERALL SELECTION.  Malcolm Jenkins is, however.  They will not reach simply to fill a need!  No team that likes to win acts so desperately.  Loadholt could play immediately at right tackle, and could eventually become a left tackle.  He has developed some bad habbits in college, due to the shotgun system he constantly blocked out of, but with some NFL coaching and experience, he could develop into a very nice NFL left tackle.   
 
By the way, on the right side you have to deal with (twice per year) Robert Mathis, Javon Kearse, and whoever Houston drafts HIGH to play opposite Mario Williams.  Don&#039;t fool yourself.  You need a right tackle too.  Your left tackle, Khalif Barnes is better there than Tony Pashos(?) is on the right side.  An ideal situation would be to trade up in the draft to get one of the &quot;big three&quot;, allowing Barnes to move to the right side. 
 
The only thing I can do to help you is to suggest that you call Jacksonville and ask them to trade up, if you feel it&#039;s THAT big of a need.  Keep your chin up.  There&#039;s always free agency.  Best of luck! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bryan&#8230;I feel your pain.  Unfortunately, as you will see in April, Michael Oher is sliding down draft boards, and doesn&#39;t figure to go until the teens or later.  As you know, the other three are gone by the time the Jags pick.  I would have had the Jags select either of the two Smiths or Monroe, had any of them been there at eight.  Oher is NOT WORTH A #8 OVERALL SELECTION.  Malcolm Jenkins is, however.  They will not reach simply to fill a need!  No team that likes to win acts so desperately.  Loadholt could play immediately at right tackle, and could eventually become a left tackle.  He has developed some bad habbits in college, due to the shotgun system he constantly blocked out of, but with some NFL coaching and experience, he could develop into a very nice NFL left tackle.  </p>
<p>By the way, on the right side you have to deal with (twice per year) Robert Mathis, Javon Kearse, and whoever Houston drafts HIGH to play opposite Mario Williams.  Don&#39;t fool yourself.  You need a right tackle too.  Your left tackle, Khalif Barnes is better there than Tony Pashos(?) is on the right side.  An ideal situation would be to trade up in the draft to get one of the &quot;big three&quot;, allowing Barnes to move to the right side.</p>
<p>The only thing I can do to help you is to suggest that you call Jacksonville and ask them to trade up, if you feel it&#39;s THAT big of a need.  Keep your chin up.  There&#39;s always free agency.  Best of luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

