2009 NFL Mock Draft: 5.0

NFL Mock Draft: | 1.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 |

Updated (Mar 17, 2009)

We have updated to NFL Mock Draft 6.0 Check it out!

Total Pro Sports - Introducing the Total Pro Sports Mock Draft, version 5.0. Many changes have occurred in the first three rounds as a result of the recent scouting combine, pro days, free agency, and other off-season transactions. With free agency still fully underway, you can expect frequent changes in the coming weeks as team needs change.

It is our intention to add more, more, MORE to this section as the draft approaches, making TPS your one stop shop for draft analysis. Changing team needs, player workout results, in-depth film study, character assessments, and all the other "measurables" play significant roles in where players are drafted. As new information becomes available, watch as players move up or down the draft board, possibly landing on your favorite team's roster.

Leave your comments or questions below and share your thoughts with us, as well as other NFL fans around the globe. I will respond to as many questions and comments as I can, so check back often. Let's talk talent!

Best Case - Refers to a player's "up-side". My view of what a player is likely to become in the NFL, in terms of production or equivalent talent, assuming that he reaches his full potential.

Worst Case - Refers to a player's "down-side" or "bust" potential. If you find a great NFL player's name used to describe a draftee's worst case scenario, then I am not concerned about a bust possibility, as is the case with Knowshon Moreno.

(Best Case/Worst Case are used only in the first round)

Lets take a look at the 2009 Mock NFL Draft: 5.0

Round 1

Pos	Player	Comments	Best Case/Worst Case	Change
1	Jason Smith, Baylor, OT	Recent off-season moves has made it less likely that the Lions will draft a QB number one. Smith is the most talented left tackle in the draft.	B- Walter Jones W- D'Brickeshaw Furgeson	1
2	Eugene Monroe, Virginia, OT	A top heavy class of tackles allows the Rams to select the franchise left tackle to replace aging, and often injured, Orlando Pace.	B- Tony Boselli W- Chris Samuels	4
3	Aaron Curry, Wake Forest, OLB	With Cassel now a Chief, KC is able to take the top defender in the draft. Curry is one of the most talented football players I've ever seen--PERIOD.	B- Demarcus Ware W-Julian Peterson	-
4	Matt Stafford, Georgia, QB	Hasselbeck's days in Seattle are numbered. New coach drafts new quarterback. What else is new? This is ideal for the young Stafford, giving him much needed time to develop.	B- Jay Cutler W- Kyle Boller	3
5	Brian Orakpo, Texas, OLB	An explosive pass rusher who could produce ten plus sacks as a rookie. A no brainer for a team that needs a lot of help.	B-Julius Peppers W- Adewale Ogunleye	-
6	Michael Crabtree, Texas Tech, WR	With both value left tackles gone and TJ now a Seahawk...Duh!	B- Michael Irvin W- Keyshawn Johnson	2
7	Andre Smith, Alabama, OT	Okay, so Al Davis decides not to draft the speedy receiver in round one. He's not new to risks, however, and Smith is exactly that. Huge talent with huge question marks.	B-Jeff Otah W- Leonard Davis	6
8	Vontae Davis, Illinois, CB	In a weak draft for DB's, Jacksonville takes arguably the best one on the board. Could possibly be Malcolm Jenkins here.	B-Nnamdi Asomugha W- Will Allen	6
9	BJ Raji, Boston College, DT	With the hiring of Dom Capers as the new DC, Green Bay needs a monster nose tackle to anchor its new 3-4 scheme. Look no further at 330 plus pounds.	B- Kris Jenkins W-Barry Cofield	-
10	Mark Sanchez, USC, QB	The 49ers need a left tackle and a rush linebacker. None are available that pose the value Sanchez does. The Alex Smith era is officially over. Sanchez is perfect for this offense.	B- Carson Palmer W-Trent Edwards	-
11	Everett Brown, Florida State, DE	Buffalo desperately needs a pass rusher, as they finished near the bottom of the league in sacks. Brown is a gifted athlete with a huge upside.	B- Mario Williams W-Jamaal Anderson	-
12	Rey Maualuga, ILB, USC	The ideal 3-4 inside backer. Maualuga will play side by side with newly signed Andre Davis in the middle of Denver's new 3-4.	B- Junior Seau W- Antonio Pierce	-
13	Michael Oher, Ole Miss, OT	A need pick here. The Skins badly need a right tackle and Oher is the best one on the board.	B-Orlanndo Pace W- Joe Staley	5
14	Malcolm Jenkins, Ohio State, CB	In a weak draft for DB's, New Orleans takes arguably the best one in the draft. To quote Charles Davis, of the NFL Network, "Corner? Safety? Player!"	B- Champ Baily W- Antoine Winfield	1
15	Sean Smith, Utah, S	Texans fill a huge need here, and upgrade the strong safety spot with the 6'4" Smith. Could be considered a slight reach. With no value corner on the board, Houston will look to trade down.	B- Roy Williams W- Atari Bigby	20
16	Tyson Jackson, LSU, DE	Igor Olshansky is gone. Jackson should be able to step in right away and produce.	B- Justin Tuck W- Philip Merling	16
17	Josh Freeman, Kansas State, QB	Huge arm and huge upside. The Jets QB situation is sad, to say the least. With all the value corners off the board, Freeman is their guy. Maclin is another possibility here.	B- Ben Roethlisburger W- Jim Druckenmiller	-
18	Jeremy Maclin, Missouri, WR	Pure speed and agility! The Bears need a true number one receiver with speed. Maclin fits that description better than anyone on the board. DE Robert Ayers is another possibility.	B- Chad Johnson W- Devin Hester	8
19	Knowshon Moreno, Georgia, RB	The new regime in Tampa is committed to building an explosive offense. Moreno will be productive immediately in this new, more open, offense. Should go sooner, via trade.	B- LaDainian Tomlinson W- Brian Westbrook	8
20	Peria Jerry, Ole Miss, DT	Trade From Dallas: Jerry will replace and upgrade the hole created by the departed Cory Redding.	B- Kevin Williams W- Broderick Bunkley	10
21	Brandon Pettigrew, Oklahoma State, TE	McNabb needs this for Philly to stay in the hunt. There are no wide outs available at 21 that pose good enough value to pass up the best TE in this draft.	B- Jason Witten W- Algae Crumpler	-
22	Alex Mack, California, C	With Matt Birk gone, the Vikings must replace him with an equal to keep that explosive running game intact. Tough to do, but Mack can do it.	B- Andre Gurode W- Matt Birk	-
23	Aaronn Maybin, Penn State, OLB	Slightly undersized backer who plays big with speed off the edge. The Pats OLB's aren't the youngest group in the league. Maybin will fit well in the New England 3-4, and produce some much needed sacks.	B- Shawn Merriman W- Manny Lawson	-
24	Brian Cushing, USC, OLB	Cushing is a complete linebacker and will eventually replace aging Keith Brooking.	B- Lance Briggs W- Scott Fujita	-
25	Larry English, Northern Illinois, OLB	This draft is not short on rush linebackers, and the Dolphins are thrilled. They have more pressing needs, but won't find better value.	B- Joey Porter W- Karlos Dansby	-
26	Derrius Heyward-Bey, Maryland, WR	Baltimore needs a speed receiver badly and are thrilled that DHB slides to 26.	B- Joey Galloway W- Charles Rogers	19
27	Hakeem Nicks, North Carolina, WR	With Marvin Harrison's release, the Colts must fill a huge hole. Nicks is perfect for Indy's system with great hands and runs precise routes.	B-Reggie Wayne W- Muhsin Muhammad	-
28	William Beatty, Connecticut, OT	Trade From Carolina: With Tra Thomas gone, and an aging incumbent right tackle, Beatty can play either side and will replace Tra Thomas eventually.	B- Matt Light W- Levi Brown	8
29	Kenny Britt, Rutgers, WR	Britt is 6'4" and highly athletic. Britt will begin filling the void left by Plaxico Burress, if Plex does not return, or will be a nice compliment to him.	B-Plaxico Burress W- Reggie Williams	-
30	Percy Harvin, Florida, WR	Finally a speed receiver! Too late for Vince Young to benefit perhaps, but much needed to keep defenses honest against that potent rushing attack.	B- Steve Smith W- Sinorice Moss	6
31	Chris Wells, Ohio State, RB	Filling a huge need, Arizona finally gets the power back with speed that should keep them in contention.	B- Larry Johnson W- LenDale White	12
32	Eben Britton, Arizona, OT	Pitt fills a huge need and should be able to upgrade the right tackle spot immediately. Britton could develop into a solid left tackle in the future.	B- Jordan Gross W-Ryan Diem	4

Round 2

Pos	Player	Comments	Change
33	Robert Ayers, Tennessee, DE	Detroit looks to improve their D-Line again with Ayers, the best run stuffing 4-3 end in the draft with excellent pass rush ability. He could go as high as 18, to Chicago, but the "one year wonder" fear may keep him out of round one.	18
34	Darius Butler, Connecticut, CB	Trade From KC: Filling a huge need here, Butler is the most complete corner on the board.	-
35	James Laurinaitis, Ohio State, ILB	The Rams fill one of many needs in an attempt to bring respectability back to St. Louis. WR is likely if any of my first round guys slide. Otherwise, Laurinaitis is the best player on the board addressing their needs.	10
36	Brian Robiskie, Ohio State, WR	The Browns have a number of needs, but reliability at the wide receiver position will be critical for young Brady Quinn in 2009. Robiskie is polished and will be an excellent compliment to the inconsistent Braylon Edwards.	16
37	Jason Meredith, South Carolina, OT	Meredith is a fast riser who had an excellent combine. He can start day one on the right side, and will add depth on the left, protecting an injury-prone quarterback, and/or possibly an inexperienced one.	-
38	Duke Robinson, Oklahoma, G	The best guard in the draft with first round talent. A beast of a run blocker which will improve that sub-par offensive line. Robinson is the steal of the draft, to this point.	-
39	Louis Murphy, Florida, WR	The Jags have serious issues at wide receiver. Murphy is a 4.4 guy with good size at 6'2". In my opinion, he's a better NFL receiver prospect than Florida teammate, Percy Harvin.	45
40	Michael Johnson, Georgia Tech, DE	Johnson fits the Al Davis mold perfectly. He is a freakish athlete with a huge upside. Highly inconsistent performer and fairly weak against the run, but should be explosive rushing the passer.	22
41	Clint Sintim, Virginia, OLB	Sintim is the best rush linebacker on the board and fills a huge need for the converting 3-4 defense.	-
42	Max Unger, Oregon, C	The Bills fill a glaring hole with this pick. Unger will provide some stability inside for the Bills and can play anywhere between the tackles.	11
43	Clay Matthews, USC, OLB	Matthews is a versatile linebacker who can rush the passer. He ran a better 40 times than most of the rush linebackers that went ahead of him.	-
44	Louis Delmas, Western Michigan, S	Trade From Washington: Parcels and company draft another small school player with big talent. Delmas reminds me a little of a younger Bob Sanders. He needs to add some weight, but is a big hitter with range and ball skills.	-
45	Donald Brown, Connecticut, RB	Trade From New Orleans: Brown will have no problem filling the void at RB2 left by Derrick Ward. He is a complete back that will be a nice compliment to Jacobs.	8
46	DJ Moore, Vanderbilt, CB	Filling another hole in the secondary, Houston takes Moore to play opposite Duante Robinson. Best corner on the board at this point. Will be excellent in nickel or in zone.	7
47	Patrick Chung, Oregon, S	Trade From San Diego: Need pick to replace Rodney Harrison. Chung is in the same mold, a big hitter who plays smart.	-
48	Ron Brace, Boston College, DT	A dominant nose tackle is an absolute must when converting to the 3-4. We'll find out if Brace will become a dominant player, but he will certainly occupy space.	-
49	Phil Loadholt, Oklahoma, OT	A mammoth tackle at over 340 lbs! He should start on the right side, opposite Chris Williams, from day one, bringing the "Bear" back to Chicago's running game.	-
50	Cornelius Ingram, Florida, TE	Trade from Tampa Bay: With Winslow now gone, there is a glaring hole at TE. Cleveland nabs the tight end with the biggest upside in the draft. Had Ingram not missed the entire '08 season, he would have been a top 15 pick. A solid combine reminded scouts who he was.	-
51	William Moore, Missouri, S	Dallas has more needs than in recent history to fill. No better place to start than by replacing hard hitting Roy Williams. Moore could be his clone.	5
52	Juaquin Iglesias, Oklahoma, WR	A solid wide receiver who runs precise routes and has consistent hands. Iglesias is an excellent open field runner and should be able to start at WR2 by mid season.	10
53	LeSean McCoy, Pittsburg, RB	Philadelphia needs to get younger at running back. With the departure of Buckhalter, McCoy will get substantial playing time in his rookie season, and could become the long term replacement for Brian Westbrook.	5
54	Alphonso Smith, Wake Forest, CB	The Vikings defense lacks corners with ball skills. Smith is probably the best "ball hawk" in the draft. Need pick.	-
55	Jared Cook, South Carolina, TE	Atlanta nabs a speed tight end with a huge upside. Cook is a better blocker than most realize and will give Matt Ryan another reliable red-zone target to go with Roddy White.	10
56	Andy Levitre, Oregon State, G	Some have him rated ahead of Duke Robinson as the top guard in the draft. He will join Jake Long on the left side in Miami. Ronnie Brown and Ricky Williams couldn't be happier.	1
57	Mike Mickens, Cincinnati, CB	A physical corner in press coverage, Mickens was a four year starter for Cincinnati. At roughly 6'0", 190 lbs, he has an excellent frame and should add weight. Injury concerns have caused his slide into the late second round.	5
58	Darry Beckwith, LSU, ILB	Tenacious heavy hitter. New England needs youth at depth at linebacker. In a couple years Becwith will make an excellent tandem with Jarod Mayo.	31
59	Paul Kruger, Utah, DE	Extremely high value pick. Kruger would have been a first rounder had he stayed in school another year. He could replace Julius Peppers, who obviously wants out of Carolina.	26
60	Chase Coffman, Missouri, TE	Finally the receiving tight end to replace Jeremy Shockey. The Giants weren't the same team without Shockey. Coffman is a huge target at 6'6" and will give Eli a reliable third down target.	-
61	Evander Hood, Missouri, DT	The Colts have to get stronger at the point of attack, on both sides of the ball. Hood is always in the backfield, and will improve that porous run defense while providing some added pressure on the passer. Perfect for Indy's scheme.	-
62	Chris Baker, Hampton, DT	Imposing and athletic physical specimen who ran just over five flat in the forty and jumped over 35 inches...at a mere 328 lbs, replacing Albert Haynesworth.	15
63	Connor Barwin, Cincinatti, OLB	Barwin is a highly athletic and versatile player who lit up the scouting combine. A DE in college, Barwin could play both DE and rush linebacker in Arizona's highly diverse scheme. Perfect fit for this team!	23
64	Rashad Johnson, Alabama, S	A highly intelligent player with great intangibles and superb ball skills. If the World Champions have a weakness on defense, free safety is it. Not anymore!	-

Round 3

Pos	Player	Comments	Change
65	Herman Johnson, LSU, G	Johnson is a huge man, weighing in at his pro day at a slender 357 lbs (down from 382). This pick completes the Lions' task of rebuilding the offensive and defensive lines.	2
66	Jarius Byrd, Oregon, CB	The Rams need quality corners and Byrd is an excellent value at 66 overall. He should be able to crack the starting lineup by mid-season at worst.	-
67	Troy Kropog, Tulane, OT	KC needs to solidify that offensive line. LT Branden Albert is a natural guard. Kropog could be the answer on the left side but will start on opening day on the right.	-
68	Keenan Lewis, Oregon State, CB	Lewis is a big physical corner at 6'0" and 208 lbs. He is good in zone or bump, and will be great against the run as well. Need Pick.	-
69	Jason Phillips, TCU, ILB	Trade from Cleveland: I really like Phillips. He could be the most underrated prospect in the draft. Dallas needs to get younger at ILB. Phillips will do that and should contribute immediately.	-
70	Fenuki Tupou, Oregon, OT	An athletic tackle who can play multiple positions on the o-line. Tupou could start at right tackle immediately, while providing depth on the left side.	1
71	Sen'Derrick Marks, Auburn, DT	Incredible value pick. Marks has had some off the field issues and some motor concerns, though he is wildly talented. Perfect for the Raiders!	12
72	Fili Moala, USC, DT	Excellent quickness. A gap penetrator who will pressure the quarterback. Played some 3-4 end in college, but at this point in the draft, he can be bulked up and could eventually become a dominant DT.	-
73	Shonn Greene, Iowa, RB	An awesome power runner with tremendous balance and vision. Greene continues to slide due to slow 40 times. Who cares?! He'll be playing in a foot of snow anyway. Green Bay loves the big ten!	3
74	Xavier Fulton, Illinois, OT	Athletic tackle with good feet. Fulton drops due to injury concerns, but will add much needed depth at tackle for San Francisco.	-
75	Trevor Canfield, Cincinatti, G	Big physical guard with a mean streak. Canfield will try to fill the void left by Derrick Dockery's departure.	-
76	Mark Parson, Ohio, CB	Trade from N.O.: Parson is an under-the-radar guy with big upside. He has excellent cover skills and is a sure tackler. Absolute need pick.	-
77	Jarron Gilbert, San Diego St., DT	A truly amazing specimen. At 6'5" and 288 lbs, he ran a 4.87 at the combine. Gilbert was a DT in college but will play 3-4 end in Houston. Huge upside and should be drafted higher. Within two years, he should be starting and dominant.	4
78	Kraig Urbik, Wisconsin, G	LT may have lost a step, but interior line play is why he has been less productive. Urbik is a steal at 78, and will immediately add at least .2 to LT's average per carry all by himself.	-
79	Lawrence Sidbury, Richmond, OLB	Raw talent with all the tangibles. Very fast off the edge but will need lots of work on technique.	-
80	Danell Ellerbe, Georgia, ILB	An excellent tackler who will provide athleticism and versatility. Injury concerns have him sliding, but lack of quality inside backers keep him in round three.	-
81	Nate Davis, Ball State, QB	There is no legitimate starting quarterback in Tampa right now. Davis will have a shot to play as a rookie, even as a third round pick.	12
82	Travis Beckum, Wisconsin, TE	Trade from Dallas: A need pick here. Beckum will be a solid NFL tight end and, like most of Detroit's draft picks, he should start right away.	-
83	Asher Allen, Georgia, CB	Trade from NYJ: A good hitter and zone coverage guy. Could have gone much higher had his 40 time been better. Has experience as a returner also.	-
84	Sherrod Martin, Troy State, S	Mike Brown in done. Martin is another small school guy with lots of ability. He is a hitter and has that big play ability that Brown had is his prime.	-
85	Eric Wood, Louisville, C	Extremely high value pick. The deep and highly talented center class bears fruit in the third round for the Eagles. What a steal! There will be several instances like this in April, due to the overall depth of this draft.	43
86	Dorell Scott, Clemson, DT	Excellent height/weight/speed ratio guy. Will add depth to an aging Minnesota defensive front.	11
87	Pat White, West Virginia, WR/QB	Miami should finally be able to choose one of its two young quarterbacks, to go along with Chad Pennington, and let everyone else go. Pat White is a capable #3 quarterback who will maintain a "day job" as a wideout. Do I have to mention the Wildcat possibilities? Good receiver and save a roster spot. Good pick Bill!	-
88	Tyrone McKenzie, South Florida, OLB	McKenzie is a ferocious and intense player who is very versatile. The Ravens need depth at LB and McKenzie can play three different roles in their scheme.	-
89	Andre Brown, NC State, RB	I think this is a steal at 89, though some have Brown going later. If you watched the Senior Bowl, you know what I'm talking about. He is a 224 lb running back who can catch, block, and run. Had he played at Georgia, he'd easily be a first round back. Will add youth and depth for NE.	6
90	Chip Vaughn, Wake Forest, S	A very gifted athlete who was nothing but a playmaker in college. At over 220 lbs, Vaughn will replace future HOFer Lawyer Milloy. I actually have Vaughn rated as a second round pick unlike most. Great value here, if you asked me.	-
91	Gerald McGrath, Southern Miss, OLB	McGrath will add speed and depth the the Giants slow group of linebackers. He can play any of the three linebacker spots, but will need to add weight to be able to play every down. In a couple years, he could become a great pro.	-
92	Macho Harris, Virginia Tech, CB	A need pick here. Depth at corner is an issue for Indy, and Harris is a very physical corner, perfect for the Colts system. Speed concerns have him sliding, but excellent value at 92.	27
93	Alex Magee, Purdue, DT	At 6'3", 298 lbs, Magee is an excellent gap penetrator who will get pressure on the quarterback. He may need to add about 15 lbs to play effectively every down. For a DT, that amounts to an average breakfast. Good developmental prospect.	4
94	Jonathan Luigs, Arkansas, C	Very tough football player and great center prospect who will eventually replace Kevin Mawae.	9
95	Antoine Caldwell, Alabama, C	First team All-American, ahead of Mack, Unger, and the rest. Caldwell is an extremely intelligent technician who will eventually help open holes in a much improved running game.	3
96	A.Q. Shipley, Penn State, C	Underrated prospect due to relatively small frame and short arms. Very intelligent player with fast motor. Great technician.	-

Check back often for frequent changes during the free agency period. Leave your questions or comments below. I will respond to as many as I can.

Share and Enjoy:

If you liked this article you will probably like:

Posted by Chad Ellis on Tuesday, March 17, 2009 at 1:33 pm
Filed under Football, Let's Talk Talent, NCAA · Tagged with 2009, college football, football, mock draft, NCAA, NFL, NFL Mock Draft

Comments

45 Responses to “2009 NFL Mock Draft: 5.0”

Lance said on March 17, 2009 at 2:06 pm

Yes i agree that Matt Stafford shouldn’t be the 1st round pick for the Lions, but i don’t think the seahawks will need to pick him up, the have matt Hasselbeck, why would they waste their first round pick to make your pick a back up QB?

If anything i think Matt Stafford will go to the 49ers or the jaguars (i don’t see that happening too though) and Mark Sanchez in Tampa.

Reply
Coach Lombardi said on March 17, 2009 at 2:10 pm

I’m not a big fan of mock drafts, because they typically never work out. So its a bunch of speculation on stuff thats never going to happen, but fun to imagine the possibilities.

Personally, I’m not paying much attention to the mock’s because I think the Jay Cutler situation is going to throw a big loop in the deal. It wouldn’t surprise me if the Lions trade the number one pick for Cutler leaving the Broncos to take Stafford/Sanchez or maybe Aaron Curry or trade Cutler could be traded to San Fran and Broncos pick up Sanchez.

I feel the Mock Draft is pretty accurate though and I think if Detroit ends up keeping the pick I think they are too cheap to take a QB; so its pretty much a toss up between Smith and Stafford.

Reply
Gina said on March 17, 2009 at 2:15 pm

Bad Bengals pick.

How many wide receivers do people think the Bengals need?
We have Chad Johnson, Laveraneus Coles, Chris Henry, and drafted WR’s in the second and third rounds of last years draft.

I think they should go with B.J. Raji or the best available offensive linemen.

Reply
Wared said on March 17, 2009 at 2:30 pm

it depends on a few things. 1 does cutler get traded. if he does to whom? detroit…maybe, san fran? the jets, bears, vikings. all of those teams have picks in the first part of the middle round. if detroit manages to get cutler and keep first overall pick then they will go ot.

Reply
klungemonger said on March 17, 2009 at 2:44 pm

Yay, the Lions draft is back where it ought to be! Heavy on the D, but one thing I might do is skip the TE and add an MLB in there, we signed a blocking TE yesterday and still have a hole in the middle of the defense. Other than that I couldn’t complain much about this.

Maybe they have their eye on some linebackers and corners in next years draft too, it does seem they are not trying to plug every hole permanently this year just stick a finger in some of them for the season.

Reply
Chad Ellis said on March 17, 2009 at 2:44 pm

Gina. You’ve made comments on this blog before and I understand your desire to address the Bengals more immediate needs. You could be right, and the Bengals may take a lineman (either offensive or defensive) but teams that contstantly run around putting out fires in round one find themselves drafting high every year– like the Bengals, for example.

Johnson and Coles are both in their 30’s and Chris Henry is, well…Chris Henry. Johnson’s cap number is not small. He will not be a Bengal in 2010 without a miracle. Crabtree is a rare talent. He is not someone the Bengals have the opportunity to draft very often. When guys like him come along, you take them. Save the fireman work for later rounds and free agency. Ask the Vikings how they feel about taking Adrian Peterson a couple years ago, even though they already had two good running backs on the roster.

Reply
Chad Ellis said on March 17, 2009 at 2:47 pm

Lance…Carson Palmer was drafted #1 overall several years back and didn’t take a single snap in his rookie season. Philip Rivers was the fourth pick and didn’t start for two years. The list goes on and on. Hasselbeck is old. Again, drafts don’t only address immediate needs, they also build teams for the future.

Reply
klungemonger said on March 17, 2009 at 2:48 pm

I hope we don’t trade for Cutler. I don’t see him doing any better here than Kitna only he’d do it with a bad attitude and lots of crybabying.

Reply
GO said on March 17, 2009 at 2:49 pm

If Clay Matthews is there the Giants will Take Him
LB has been a problem for way to long

Reply
Chad Ellis said on March 17, 2009 at 2:50 pm

klungemonger…Good thought on the linebacker thing in round three. If one slides, I’m sure they’ll take him. The way my draft panned out, the last third round inside backer was picked out from under their noses at 80. Jordon Dizon is still developing. He is probably as good as anyone they’d have a shot at in round three.

Reply
Jimmy said on March 17, 2009 at 2:52 pm

Some things I disagree with.

1) Stafford going #4 to the Seahawks. Makes no sense. No one has been talking about them taking a QB at all, and there’s no reason to. They should still take Crabtree. I don’t care if they have TJ, 2 good WRs are better than 1.

2) Andre Smith at #7. I mean, Al Davis is senile, he’s stupid, he makes poor decisions. Even he isn’t that dumb to take Smith that high. You’re talking about a guy who has major character flaws and had a pro-day workout that was awful. He’s at least played himself out of the top of the first round, some scouts even think he’s played himself out of the first day. He might be worth taking a chance on with a later pick, but not that high.

3) Sanchez at #10. This guy sucks more than Stafford. I think even #17 to the Jets is a stretch. This guy started one year in college and thinks he’s ready for the NFL? Maybe its a good move by him, because given next years QB class he probably wouldn’t even be drafted on the first day. I can see maybe taking him late first round, though he’s really not even deserving of that.

4) Josh Freeman to the Jets at #17. He is worse than Stafford and Sanchez. With this weak QB class, there’s no way there are 3 first round QBs in this draft. If for some odd reason Stafford and Sanchez are off the board at #17, the Jets should just pass on a QB rather than waste a first round pick on Freeman. I’d rather have Kellen Clemens starting over any QB in this draft.

5) Percy Harvin at #30. I just see him going higher than that. Maybe mid 20s somewhere.

Reply
Chad Ellis said on March 17, 2009 at 2:53 pm

GO…I have the Giants taking a linebacker in round three. They also signed Boley during free agency. That offense has been neglected in the draft for years, in my opinion. They’ve asked Eli Manning to do too much with too little for too long. This is the year they make it right.

Reply
Amber said on March 17, 2009 at 3:00 pm

i think the charger will go for rey magulagua, and denver for BJ Raji

Reply
Chad Ellis said on March 17, 2009 at 3:05 pm

Jimmy…It would take up too much space to reply to your assessment properly. What I will say is this:

1. Stafford: Hasselbeck is old and injury prone. A replacement is needed long term. When will they be picking in the top five again?

2. Andre Smith: You’re WAY OFF on your assessment of his pro day and of him as a player. Character issues, yes. Out of the first day?..YOU’VE GOT TO BE KIDDING ME. I’ve read some of the same articles you’ve obviously read. Instead of taking that rhetoric seriously, though, I laughed. Watch the draft. He will not fall past 13 overall to the Redskins.

3. Sanchez: Again, I don’t know where you get your information and I don’t have the time to explain how talent is evaluated, but Sanchez is probably even better than Stafford. Had he waited to come out next year, he’d have been the consensus number one pick.

4. Freeman: 17 is probably a little high for him but the weak QB class will see him go in the first round. Last year, Joe Flacco was projected to be a second round pick. He went at 18, and the Ravens went to the AFC title game.

5. Harvin: The least polished of all the receivers projected to go in the late first/early second round. Throw in durability concerns and he might not go until round two. Great college players don’t always make great pros.

Reply
Chad Ellis said on March 17, 2009 at 3:06 pm

Amber…If Raji is available at 12, I agree with you. I seriously doubt he will be.

Reply
Rob K said on March 17, 2009 at 3:07 pm

I agree that the Lions will take the OL from Baylor. I do not agree with Andre Smith staying that high or Mark Sanchez going anywhere close to the top 10. Also I noticed a silly comparison; comparing Knowshon Moreno to:

Best Case- LaDainian Tomlinson

Worst Case- Brian Westbrook

Please. He won’t be near either of them.

Reply
Chad Ellis said on March 17, 2009 at 3:12 pm

Rob K…On all counts, we will see.

Reply
The Rundown said on March 17, 2009 at 3:21 pm

Looking at the first round:

Seattle taking a 1st round QB just doesn’t feel right this year. I don’t think they’re ready to go younger yet (as evidenced by the TJ Houshmandzadeh signing), so I think they’ll try to get a player with more immediate impact.

It seems overly optimistic on the best/worse case for Orakpo. I think Cleveland’s coaching staff is more offense oriented, and I’d bet they try to get a weapon to replace Winslow.

I don’t think SF takes another young QB after the Alex Smith experience.

The Vikings took John Sullivan at C last year and are pretty happy with the way he’s developed. Their current RT is also a converted center. They won’t waste a high pick on another rookie C — which isn’t even a premier position in the NFL.

Nice zig on the Pat’s pick. Everyone else is saying Laurinitis.

I really like the Skins and Jets analysis.

Overall, this is a very nice analysis and guide to the draft.

Reply
Jaydizza said on March 17, 2009 at 3:35 pm

Interesting. I don’t know about an OT being the first round pick for the Lions.

Reply
klungemonger said on March 17, 2009 at 4:01 pm

Jaydizza, who can accurately predict what the Lions will do? We are banking that this new management will break with the past tradition of making poor choices. A quality left tackle is a great choice…whether they make that choice is another matter for discussion altogether.

Reply
Max Barry said on March 17, 2009 at 5:36 pm

I like a lot of these picks since they challenge the norm, but having said that I think what teams should do will often sadly be detattached from what they end up doing.

I would flip the Malualuga and Tyson Jackson picks. The guy’s big enough to play 3-4 end and he’ll help run stop, solving two Denver problems with one stone, whilst Malualuga’s stock has slid. I also believe the Chargers trade down come draft day so it’s a little irrelevant.

Moreno with Ward is a really nice one-two combo, but sadly Tampa seem to be thinking Ward can carry the work load alone with Earnest Graham used sparingly. I think they get Cutler, and go Peria Jerry or whoever the top corner is come draft day.

Also, if the Eagles can’t rely on Westbrook to stay healthy and want a second guy then they go big. It’s Wells or Moreno or no-one. I doubt they ’settle’ for a McCoy, especially since he is that shifty sort of player who catches out of the backfield and there isn’t a world of difference between him and Westbrook. If they do pass on Wells then I find Shonn Greene is a nicer fit, but more than likely they would pass on a ‘lesser’ back (remember they traded for and like Lorenzo Booker) in favour of a big framed WR opposite Jackson like a Britt or Robiskie.

Reply
Mike J said on March 18, 2009 at 6:07 pm

Why would the Bucs take a RB?? They have Ward, Graham,& maybe Wms.. They need a DT, OLB, CB, & WR.

Reply
JOEinPHX said on March 18, 2009 at 6:37 pm

I agree with Gina that there’s no way the Bengals tab Crabtree, for exactly the reasons she lays out. My other team is the Falcons, and while I like the idea of Brian Cushing, I have to question the credibility of anyone who says he ‘will eventually replace aging Keith Brooking’. Brooking is already long gone – get yourself up to speed TPS.

Reply
Gary L said on March 18, 2009 at 11:11 pm

The only pick that makes sense for the Dolphins in your mock is Pat White.

1) You have Miami picking “rush linebacker” Larry English. Instead of a WR like DHB, Harvin, or Hicks. I know Bill doesn’t usually pick WR in the first round, but any of those three make more sense than Larry English. I would think that if Miami is going to draft a 3-4 OLB in the first it is going to be Clint Sintim, b/c he has played the position and excelled in it and he is not a project pick.

2a) You have the Dolphins selecting S Louis Delmas from Western Michigan, why? They have signed two S for mulitple years what would be the point? Why not a NT like Ron Brace?

2b) Why a G here, why not WR or CB?

Reply
Chad Ellis said on March 19, 2009 at 2:50 am

JOEinPHX…As you can see, we’ve done five of these drafts and wrote many of these comments before Brooking moved on, but you’re absolutely right. The truth is that I noticed a couple others like that as well. The Brooking comment was written before he left ATL, as were others prior to free agency. I will go back over it and make an update to the comments. Addressing your comment further…I’m not sure how a simple oversight would relate to credibility, but you have the right to your opinion. I think most would agree that the pick makes sense. After all, isn’t that the whole purpose of a mock draft?

As far as Crabtree, you could be right. If you are, don’t be surprised if the Bengals are drafting a receiver in round one next year because Chad Johnson may not be there. Even if he is, he is not the same receiver he once was. Coles will not be effective without a legit number one target opposite him and EVEN HIS best days are behind him. I’d be surprised if the Arizona Cardinals had the sixth pick in the draft and passed on Crabtree, but who knows?

Reply
Chad Ellis said on March 19, 2009 at 3:02 am

Mike J…Knowshon Moreno is a unique talent and yes, the Bucs did sign Ward, but he has never carried the load. Moreno and Ward would be a dynamic backfield, much like Dunn and Alstott were the last time the Bucs were a contender. Graham provides depth, but Moreno gives the Bucs a two headed monster such as the Giants, Titans, and Panthers all had last year. It’s no surprise to me why those teams posted some of the top winning percentages in the league. If the Bucs want a dominant offense, it has to start with a dominant running game. I’m sorry but Ward cannot do that on his own.

On a side note, I seriously doubt that Moreno will be there at 19 anyway. I strongly believe that he’ll go in the top ten, in a “surprise pick” scenario (say Cleveland or Cincinatti), or someone will trade up to take him between 11 and 15. The entire league are going to be kicking themselves next year for not recognizing how special this guy is.

Reply
Chad Ellis said on March 19, 2009 at 3:30 am

Max Barry…I don’t disagree with most of what you said. All of the points you make are valid and plausible. The one scenario we’ll have to “agree to disagree” on is that I just can’t see the Eagles taking a big back like Wells or Greene. If Westbrook were completely done, I’d agree with you that they would probably consider Wells in round one, were he available at 28. Until Westbrook is gone, the production that can be expected from any back brought in to join him will be limited. Having two quality backs is a luxury, I think you’d agree. It isn’t one that the Eagles can afford in 2009, I don’t believe. They lost Tra Thomas (LT) to Jacksonville and Jon Runyan (RT) is 35 years old. Those facts force the Eagles to use one of their first round picks on a tackle. The other pick will go to help McNabb complete passes on third down. You could make a case for a power back in later rounds, like Liberty’s Rashad Jennings, if he’s there in the third. When the team desperately needs a big tight end or wideout, I don’t see them passing on one in favor of a short yardage back. It comes down to production with that pick. They could use a back to carry a hundred balls a year and convert some tough short yardage situations. That’s not enough production to spend a first round pick, in my opinion, as long as Westbrook is getting the Lion’s share of the touches. Additionally, I think the eventual replacement for Westbrook will be a guy like him–an “all pupose back”. Someone like McCoy fits that mold better than a bruiser like Greene or even a down hill runner like Wells, even though I agree that McCoy is not the ideal replacement–Moreno would be. Now, if HE’S there at 21, all bets are off. Hire two bus drivers to play tackle for all I care, just pick Moreno! That scenario is highly unlikely, in my opinion, despite what the rest of blogdom might think. He’s a top ten talent. Someone will trade up to take him in that area. Just my opinion. Thanks for posting!

Reply
Chad Ellis said on March 19, 2009 at 3:52 am

Gary L…Delmas, “upon further review”, is probably not the way to go, now that the Fins have signed G. Wilson. I simply missed that one. You’ll see the change in the next mock. Thanks for pointing it out.

As far as the first round pick, I think Sintim is a slight reach in the first round, but Parcels might see it differently. English is more athletic and will easily learn the in’s and out’s of the 3-4 during his rookie season. I had him going before Sintim simply because he has a better upside and is worthy, from a scouting perspective, of that pick. Parcells has his standards, which I am not 100% privied to, so he’ll pick ‘em how he sees ‘em. I know that he loves picking defense in round one, and all of the receivers you mentioned are projects. They drafted a HIGH first round project a few years back in Ginn. He has yet to prove he deserved it. DHB and Harvin both have similar developmental issues. If they want a receiver, it will be someone fairly polished, like Robiskie, early in round two. In my mock, he was already gone by then. Considering value, I had them take Levitre with pick two of the second. They have basically made it public that they will be looking to upgrade the left guard position early in the draft–another Parcells type pick. They like LSU’s Herman Johnson a lot as well, a late 2nd to early third round guy. Thanks for your comments!

Reply
Matt said on March 19, 2009 at 8:36 am

I like your draft, except for the fact that you have not solved one of there biggest problems the MLB position. Who is going to play the MLB? Lenon and thank god for that has been released, they have no one. The only change I would make to your draft is I would take a MLB with my first pick in the third round and a CB or Safety with my second pick in the third round. TE is a need, but they have three on the roster and they just signed Heller from the Seahawks. If they draft Smith first like you have it then Backus goes to the left guard and they resigned there other RG. Not that I am fan of either Backus or Peterman, but it is what it is.

Reply
Loren said on March 20, 2009 at 12:26 am

Like Matt, I like your mock but the Lions biggest need is MLB. They should fill that place at #20. Andre Fluellen will be an upgrade at the DT position so Cory Redding won’t be missed.

For the 2nd round, NT is a bigger area of need than DE. Dewayne White is adequate and Cliff Avril was turning into a sack master at the end of the season. Drafting Ron Brace at #33 would be a need pick, but I don’t really like it.

Reply
klungemonger said on March 20, 2009 at 4:43 pm

Mayhew is making good on his word that he won’t tip his hand what they are planning to do. They are giving attention to the top candidates at EVERY need position by bringing them for private workouts, not saying much after they are gone, and the FA acquisitons are balanced and don’t reveal any draft strategy either. Honestly I think he’s waiting to see if another team tips it’s hand on wanting one of these guys then he’ll make like he wants them too & try to pounce on a trade-down. Smart, but frustrating for us with this waiting game!

Leaving the MLB spot open I still think Curry is a possibility, I’d definitely like to see that but Raji just had a workout and although everyone says he needs to go to a 3-4 I don’t see the difference, he needs a double team and will bust up a line in a 4-3 just the same. An acceptable compromise to me! He can stuff a run, that’s our #1 weakness so I’m all about him too.

Reply
Chad Ellis said on March 21, 2009 at 5:44 am

To the Lions Faithful…I agree that Detroit needs to upgrade the Mike backer spot. The fact that they need so many holes filled at so many positions keeps me from giving them one in the first three rounds. Matt makes a good point about the tight end pick in round three. They could probably wait a year to pick a tight end. If they do, that might be the spot they take a Mike. The positional value of a middle linebacker just does not compare to their defensive linemen counterparts. With their first five picks (if you count the tight end pick), I have them taking five linemen. That will build the foundation needed to begin construction on a winning football team. Middle backers can be gotten in later rounds, in most drafts, and are largely ineffective anyway without protection from a solid front four. If they really want one, Laurinaitis would be a decent value at 33, though I see him with huge bust potential. I like Darry Beckwith. If he is there at the top of round three, they might take him there. I’d rather build the two lines with my first three rounds then go from there; but I’m not the one pulling the trigger. We’ll see if the new Detroit management team agrees with me or not. Thanks to all for your comments. 6.0 is coming soon!

Reply
Matt said on March 21, 2009 at 8:57 am

Chad I agree with your thoughts, and if the Lions hadn’t traded there fifth round pick for Peterson, then I would think the Lions could take Brinkley the MLB from South Carolina, and if they could or could have done that and add the rest of your draft then I agree with your concept and they did build a foundation, except for Backus at left tackle, but it is what it is. I like the lay out of your entire draft, you have a much better concept then the so called experts and you should e-mail and give them a reality check, Kiper are you listening.

The only thing that could happen to throw this draft into a spin is if the Lions acquire Cutler and what would it take to do it. It would include a third team and draft picks switching that would make it interesting and guess what Kiper and the other so called experts will be moving to your draft prognosis.

Reply
klungemonger said on March 21, 2009 at 12:10 pm

I hope we don’t end up with Cutler…please no!
I can get with a full line rebuild on both sides, if we need it it’s all good.

Reply
Chad Ellis said on March 21, 2009 at 4:50 pm

klungemonger and Matt…I agree with you regarding Cutler. It’s not that I don’t think he could lead the team to a Super Bowl in four to five years, it’s just that they would have to give up more than they can afford to lose at this stage. Quarterback is an issue, but the Lions could do a lot of good by keeping the picks they have in the next two drafts. Loved the Peterson trade, but getting Cutler and giving up at least one first round pick is too much right now. Another team may have the luxury of making that move–not Detroit. I see him going to Chicago, Tampa Bay, or New York–Chicago is the favorite, I think.

On a side note, I always liked Culpepper, before he had his string of injuries. He was once a league MVP candidate and a Pro Bowler. His 39 TD pass season (2004) is still one of the best QB seasons of all time. I may be underestimating the impact those injuries have had, but I think he can approach that level of play once again. All he needs is a solid o-line, which we all hope is addressed in this draft. He’s already got a nice running back and a “Randy Moss” type receiver. This will be his second consecutive season with one team. I think that will do his confidence and development a lot of good. He should be ready to roll this year. Based on the contract he was awarded, I think Detroit might be inclined to agree. If they’re not sold, they are definately hoping. Thanks again.

Reply
Matt said on March 22, 2009 at 1:04 pm

I totally agree with your statement. The Lions would better served by using all of there picks to fix holes and I believe they need to find out if Stanton can play. If he can’t you have Caulpepper already under contract.

I believe they will take the best MLB available with there first pick in the third round. They could take Beckum, but if Sidbury is there you take him, because of his upside.

They should take Brandstater if he is available in the 6th round. He has the most upside of any QB and could be ready next year or the following year. From what I saw of him at the combine he impresses me the most of any of the QB’s.

But your right stick with the picks the next two years and build from the trenches out and then look for a QB, if you don’t already have one.

Reply
Dave D said on March 22, 2009 at 2:38 pm

Being a ……gulp……Lion fan, this is the first mock that I agree with!!
I’ve always been taught that you start with the lines. If they don’t exist….your skill players are in for a rough go of it.
Good job!

Reply
klungemonger said on March 23, 2009 at 6:36 pm

Recent interviews with Lions coaching staff reveals they plan to incorporate a mixture of 4-3 and 3-4 defensive schemes, and they state that they basically want to “cross-train” the linebackers so they are functional as weakside or strongside, in whatever configuration. This could be a ploy to confuse all of us guessers even further, but if it’s true it leaves wide open the option to go with a defender at #1 like Raji or Curry. They also stated they like Curry’s versatility to play any LB spot so I wouldn’t rule anything out.

Correct me if I’m wrong but when you say “positional value”, are you talking about the money associated with a high pick position being out of sync with the salary associated with the players position, or are you referring to the impact the player’s position has on the game being relative to the pick number of the draft?

The Lions are negotiating with players right now to see who will give the best deal and sign in order to go #1, I think if they find a guy who realizes his position only nets a certain amount of money and will agree to play for that (rather than demand a J.Russell or M.Ryan contract just for going first) they will draft that guy regardless of position. So it seems to me that if you get the BPA at a salary commensurate with the other top guys playing his position, the value is there.

I read that Stafford’s agent is known for instigating hold-outs and stuff, let’s hope he botches up any chance for Matty Blue Skies to come here! Also they are now checking out Sanchez, have to wait and see what that’s all about…

Reply
Chad Ellis said on March 23, 2009 at 8:19 pm

klungemonger…Good question. I apologize for not clarifying earlier. Positional value relates to all of the variables that you brought up: dollars/impact/draft position/player’s position. Let’s take wide receivers, for example…Basically the reason why wide receivers rarely go number one is that they don’t make an impact on every play like a quarterback or a left tackle would make. In addition, the difference in terms of talent between a Michael Crabtree and a Hakeem Nicks isn’t glaring enough for most teams to spend a top five pick. Many feel that they could draft a guy in the second round who would produce numbers close to what that stud top five guy could produce at a fraction of the cost. Passing on the wideout in the first allows them to spend that top five pick on a position where the talent differences between the top five of the first and second rounds IS glaring–like left tackle, for example. Looking at quarterbacks, since so few can be had in free agency who play that position EXTREMELY well, it makes the value of a supremely gifted quarterback extremely high on draft day. Then there is the element of technical skill versus ability…Some positions require more technique, which can be taught, while others require more innate ability, which can’t be taught. Another word for something that isn’t or can’t be taught is TALENT. Some of those abilities in the NFL are: instincts, leaping ability, speed, size, quickness, armstrength, etc. Looking at that list, there are some positions which need those traits more so than others to be successful in the NFL. Long story short it takes more talent to play left tackle than it does to play center. It takes more talent to play rush linebacker than it does to play middle linebacker. Thus, those positions are typically in higher demand, obviously causing those players to be drafted higher.

In the case of Aaron Curry, depending on how he’s used, (should be a rush linebacker in my opinion, ala DeMarcus Ware) he has excellent value in this draft and is a lock top five pick. Having said that, his “positional value” is still not as great as Jason Smith or Eugene Monroe because the combination of skills it takes to be a top NFL left tackle is more difficult to find that the skills it takes to be a top rush linebacker. I have Clint Sintim, Larry English, Aaron Maybiin, and a few others rated as late first/early second round picks. While Curry is better than all of them, he is not three times better than any of them. That same statement CAN’T be made for the left tackles. Not only are Monroe and Smith much better than their second round counterparts, it is unlikely that any of those second round guys will even start at left tackle in the NFL, at least not as rookies, because they don’t have the skill set to match up against the Julius Peppers’ or Dwight Freeney’s of the world. After J. Smith and Monroe, there are no sure left tackles in this draft. Oher, A. Smith, Britton, Beatty, and the rest are all first year right tackles, in all likelihood, and many of them will NEVER develop into starting left tackles. Two players in an entire draft, at a given position, who can come in and start immediately–that is the definition of positional value.

Reply
Matt said on March 24, 2009 at 1:55 pm

Again I love your draft, but as much as I would love to see them replace Backus altogther, they can’t trade him because of his contract. So, although you and I both agree they need a really good OG, they can’t afford to pass on a MLB with the first pick in the Third round. Keep the TE, but lose Johnson, I like Johnson much better the Backus or Backup as we like to call him. I Iike either Blackwith or Brinkley or Ellerbe or McGrath in that order. Then the Lions would have pulled off a very good draft. Oh, almost forgot take Brandstater with there 6th round pick and then they have pulled off a very good draft. Caulpepper will work for a year or two while Brandstater gets ready.

Reply
Chad Ellis said on March 24, 2009 at 5:45 pm

Matt…Even with Backus moving inside to left guard, Stephen Peterman at right guard needs to be upgraded. If there were a good enough linebacker to take with the 65th pick, I’d have them take him. It’s a value thing for me. Herman Johnson is a second round prospect. If you have a chance to get him in the third, I think you do. There will be other Mike backers later in the draft. Signing a free agent or trading a late round pick for one is another option. Everyone keeps forgetting that they just drafted Dizon out of the second round last year. Teams rarely give up on a player after one season. We’ll see.

Reply
Matt said on March 25, 2009 at 8:55 am

Yes I agree that they should not give up on Dizon, but Mayhew said in an interview about a month ago, “that they looking for a MLB, because there is no one on the roster who can handle it, and we don’t think Dizon is the answer. We believe he is a backup/ special teams player”, article Detroit Free Press. Look I have been a scout for two NFL pro teams, I have heard it all and yes that article could just be posturing, but I don’t think so. Dizon was a reach last year and I watched him, yes he can make tackles the problem is that he gets blocked and can’t get off of the block. He is not big enough or strong enough to shed his blocker. And yes I totally agree that Johnson is a much better prospect then Peterman, who I think is a journeyman at best, but they will start Peterman with his new contract. I agree that they could take a MLB later in the draft, Brinkley comes to mind, but they don’t have a fourth round or fifth round pick and we have to use what we have now to develop a mock. Johnson is a second round talent, but I like the TE idea better with the second pick and take the best MLB available with that pick. If Blackwith drops or McGrath is there you take them.

Now if you take Johnson and McGrath, I guess you can reach and take Brinkley that is also a very good move. We have to remember this is the Lions and yes we have to give a little credit that the new front office has done a decent job in the off season, but I still question there drafting until they can prove to me that they are capable of picking the right players, and there are no MLB’s left in FA worth anything.

So, what does it all mean. I agree with your draft if they can trade to pick up another pick that brings them Brinkley. Then I would go with your draft and say it was a great draft by Lions standards. They would have solved there LT needs for ten years, They would have added an impact DT and DE. They would have added a starting OG, well really two OG’s Backus and Johnson, and a starting TE. Most importantly Brinkley would give them a strong and fast MLB that hits like a freight train.

Reply
Matt said on March 25, 2009 at 9:51 am

It not fair that we get to look at your draft and make comments without giving you the same opportunity. I have only completed my first round, and we are in synch with most of the picks take a look and let me know how you feel.

Thanks
Although everybody says Stafford is a franchise QB. Well the numbers don’t agree. Cutler who had less talent against the same competition was very successful then Stafford who had better talent surrounding him. He never won the big game and his stats, his footwork says that no team, especially a team that has taken flash over substance in past drafts, should invest $80 million in him. Instead, build the trenches, J. Smith, Peria, and maybe pick up Mack for a Riola trade and a late pick, is a good start. Then add Chung SS, followed by either McGrath or Blackwirth MLB then either Parson or Asher at the CB or Pegus at safety or the Beckum the TE from Wisconson. That’s a very good draft, they have filled some of there holes and they have built a foundation for a future. Take a QB next year or take Brandstater in the 6th round. He has better potential then a lot of the QB’s taken before him.
Updated 3/25/09

1 – DET: Smith, Jason – OL – Baylor
Swartz wants to build from the trenches, and Smith is the answer for the next ten years.
2 – STL: Monroe, Eugene – OL – Virginia
They need a replacement for Pace and he fits the bill.
3 – KC: Orakpo, Brian – DE – Texas
KC is making the transition to a 3-4 and Orakpo is a great fit.
4 – SEA: Stafford, Matthew – QB – Georgia
Hasselbecks days are numbered.
5 – CLE: Curry, Aaron – OLB – Wake Forest
Curry’s forty time will help a slow defense, put pressure on the QB, and give them an impact LB.
6 – CIN: Raji, B.J. – DT – Boston College
This will help the middle of a very week defense against the run.
7 – OAK: Harvin, Percy – WR – Florida
The Raiders could go Bey here, but the fact that Davis fell in love with Harvin at the combines makes this an easy decision.
8 – JAX: Crabtree, Michael – WR – Texas Tech
Jax has looked for a big time receiver that can get deep to stretch the defense. Bey fits the need here.
9 – GB: Brown, Everette – DE – Florida State
Its a toss up here Johnson or BRown. Alphabetical order reigns.
10 – SF: Smith, Andre – OL – Alabama
Singeltary takes risk here, but they need a OT and he fits the bill.
11 – BUF: Johnson, Michael – DE – Georgia Tech
The Bills need to pressure on the QB and Jackson is the best of what is left.
12 – DEN: Jackson, Tyson – DE – LSU
Denver needs to find a player to put pressure on the QB in there new 3-4 system.
13 – WAS: Ayers, Robert – DE – Tennessee
They need a pass rushing DE to replace Taylor.
14 – NO: Jenkins, Malcolm – CB – Ohio State
They need to find help for there weak secondary. Malcolm can play either the FS or the CB on the next level and that will help a very weak secondary.
15 – HOU: Cushing, Brian – OLB – USC
I think its to early for Cushing, but the Texans are in need of a big play OLB and Cushing fits there bill.
16 – SD: Maualuga, Rey – ILB – USC
They could take Oher, but the need to fill there MLB, out weighs there OL needs.
17 – NYJ: Freeman, Josh – QB – Kansas St.
Favre retires enough said. They like his potential and his big arm, Ryan has seen what a big armed QB can do in Baltimore with a great defense.
18 – CHI: Heyward-Bey, Darrius – WR – Maryland
They missed out on the top prospects, but the need for speed on the offense out weighs the need for a CB.
19 – TB: Sanchez, Mark – QB – USC
Unless they find away to trade for Cutler the Bucks need a QB very badly.
20 – DET: Jerry, Peria – DT – Mississippi
The Lions continue to build the trenches. Peria is a major upgrade over Cory Redding.
21 – PHI: Oher, Michael – OL – Mississippi
They take the best OL to fill there need at LT.
22 – MIN: Maclin, Jeremy – WR – Missouri
The only top receiver prospect left on the board.
23 – NE: Barwin, Connor – OLB – Cinncinnati
Barwin’s stock is rising after his pro day, when he ran a sub 4.50 forty.
24 – ATL: Hood, Evander – DT – Missouri
They lost Jackson and need to replace him. Hood is the best of the DT’s left.
25 – MIA: English, Larry – DE – Northern Illinois
He is a perfect fit for there 3-4 scheme.
26 – BAL: Laurinaitis, James – ILB – Ohio State
They need to find a replacement for Bart Scott.
27 – IND: Nicks, Hakeem – WR – North Carolina
The inside defense is a major concern, but with all of the first round DT’s off the board they take a young fast receiver to give Manning a new option to try and replace Harrison.
28 – PHI: Moreno, Knowshon – RB – Georgia
They need to fill there RB hole behind Westbroke who always in injured, and they do it with this pick.
29 – NYG: Britt, Kenny – WR – Rutgers
The only top receiver left to help a weak receiving core.
30 – TEN: Matthews, Clay – OLB – USC
The Titan LB’s are getting older. With all of the top receivers off the board they take a BPA.
31 – ARI: Wells, Chris – RB – Ohio State
He could fall into the second round, but with Moreno gone, they take the next best RB to compliment Hightower.
32 – PIT: Mack, Alex – OL – California
The Steelers are looking for a Center and would like to find a veteran. The Lions are tired of Raiola’s game and he comes cheap to the Steelers, cheaper then a first round selection. The Lions could make a deal with Pittsburgh, but either way the Mack goes here.

Reply
Author, Editor said on March 25, 2009 at 1:01 pm

We have updated our mock draft take a look

http://www.totalprosports.com/blog/index.php/2009/03/2009-nfl-mock-draft-6/

Reply
Chad Ellis said on March 25, 2009 at 2:36 pm

Matt…I hadn’t heard that comment made about Dizon. While I believe it is authentic, I’m surprised that the Lions organization would call out one of their own players to that degree–wait, we are talking about the Lions–nevermind, I’m not surprised. At any rate, you and klungemonger have sold me on the their intentions at MLB. I’m sure you’ll be pleased with my latest mock. It is up now. Click on the link above this comment.

Impressive first round! I agree with your logic on most of the picks. It’s a hung jury right now on “Jay-Lau”. I think he’s a little soft to be a Mike backer in the NFL. His best fit, in my opinion, would be in a Tampa-Two scheme, or as a 4-3 Will. Since the Tampa-two teams won’t be going linebacker in the first, I think he drops to round two. Curry switching spots with Orakpo is an interesting idea. If that happens, its a case of Curry’s versatility hurting his draft stock, if that makes any sense (Jack of all trades, master or none, kind of thing). I think you’re probably right about Stafford going to Seattle. They will need some balls to make that pick and I’m not sure they’re ready to do it, though it will be strongly considered at the very least. Harvin going before Crabtree made me smile. I could see Al Davis doing something like that because of Harvin’s speed, though I think he’d still take Crabtree if he were available at seven. THAT is a pick that would take a HUGE pair. Davis has that, if nothing else. The way we see the receivers coming off the board differs a little, but again I can’t argue with your logic. Sanchez falling to 19 is probably the only thing that I completely disagree with. Based on film evaluation, I just think he is the best QB prospect in this draft and will go far ahead of Freeman–maybe even Stafford by the time all is said and done. That’s another case of the jury being out. If you asked ten people what they thought of the QB’s in this draft, the opinions would vary substantially. Nice job overall. You’ll have to send me the link to your website or get in touch with TPS. Maybe we can do a link swap. Don’t forget to check out 6.0!

Reply