Antonio Brown’s Sexual Assault Accuser Claims To have Passed Lie Detector Test On Allegations

(Photo by Christian Petersen/Getty Images)

Britney Taylor, the woman who is suing Antonio Brown for sexually assaulting and raping her during three separate encounters, is now claiming that she took a polygraph test after the alleged incidents which proved she told the truth.

Taylor claims she went to “one of the nation’s leading examiners, who previously led the FBI’s polygraph program” and was asked about 2 of the 3 incidents allegedly carried out by Brown.

Taylor claims the first incident happened in June 2017 during a training session when “Brown exposed himself and kissed [her] without her consent.”

Taylor then describes a second alleged incident … “Later that month, Brown, while positioned behind her, began masturbating near her without her knowledge and ejaculated on her back.”

In the lawsuit filed on Tuesday, she stated the polygraph exam confirmed her “completely truthful account.”

It should be noted the a majority of courts in this country do not deal with polygraph evidence as they are not considered scientifically valid for evidentiary purposes.

She also revealed to have a paper trail that proves she is telling the truth, because after the alleged incidents, she purchased an STD test and a pregnancy test at Walgreens just weeks later.

Brown and his legal team have denied all allegations and plan to countersue her for extortion.

Brown’s legal representation released the following statement:

“Mr. Brown denies each and every allegation in the lawsuit. He will pursue all legal remedies to not only clear his name, but to also protect other professional athletes against false accusations. Mr. Brown was approached by his accuser in 2017, shortly after Mr. Brown signed a contract making him the highest paid wide receiver in the NFL. At that time, Mr. Brown was asked to invest $1.6 million dollars in the accuser’s business project. Mr. Brown was not informed by his accuser that she had just been levied with a $30,000 IRS tax lien or that $300,000 of the $1.6 million so called “investment” was to be used to purchase property already owned by the accuser and her mother. When Mr. Brown refused to make the $1.6 million “investment,” the accuser supposedly cut off communications with Mr. Brown. However, in 2018, the accuser resurfaced and offered to travel to Pennsylvania and South Florida to train Mr. Brown for the upcoming season.”